Redémarrage du PC en connexion internet

Bonsoir,

Ce topic n'est pas lié à la vidéo, mais il empêche au moins un repairenaute (NoëlNONO) d'aller sur le repaire. je pensais que son problème pouvait être lié à son disque qui avait eu des soucis, mais ce soir quelqu'un m'a appelé pour le même problème.

Je vais aller chercher sur des forums informatique, mais quelqu'un ici a peut être déjà la réponse.

Le problème : ils sont sous Win XP et après quelques minutes de connexion internet (repaire ou autres sites) un message s'affiche (je n'ai pas le message exact : initié par autorité NT/system, windows doit redémarrer car le serveur appel de la RPC s'est terminé de façon inattendue) et le PC redémarre. Aucun soucis en montage sous première.
Ils ont eu ce problème à peu près en même temps. J'ai l'impression que c'est un correctif de XP qui fiche le bazar car Noël venait de faire un "windowsupdate"


Si je trouve des infos, je reviens car je pense que d'autres vont avoir le même soucis.

@+

 

VIRUS

il s agit du virus W32 Blaster...:(
il attaque la RPC de microsoft
il faut utiliser un antivirus recent et patcher windows... desole mais la je n ais pas d autres renseignements ... je suis chez moi

 

Merci Poulperouge,

je viens de trouver l'info et j'allais la mettre. Il semble que peu d'anti-virus détectent ce ver, il y a un utilitaire chez symantec pour l'enlever ici

J'appelle mes gaillards pour voir si c'est ça.

Encore merci

@+

 

je confirm 6 pote sont infecter
bon courage

 

Oui c'est la saloperie du jour !!

DV

 

Oui, ça semble trés à la mode ces jours-ci.

Personnellement, je ne suis pas encore touché.

Essayer d'aller sur ce site, ça peut peut-etre aider certains.

http://telecharger.clubic.com/n/n9634.html

Danbar.

 

Un peu plus d'infos.

A priori, on se prend ce ver au hasard (scan des adresses IP), c'est une attaque sur le port 135 de TCP, en installant le patch sur la page indiquée par Danbar, on se protège.

Avant de lancer l'outil de symantec, désactiver la restauration system de XP.

@+

 

Mouai, enfin avec un bon firewall et un antivirus à jour ça dois pas trop pozé de pb ?

 

pour ceux qui lisent l anglais ....

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

CERT Advisory CA-2003-20 W32/Blaster worm

Original issue date: August 11, 2003
Last revised: --
Source: CERT/CC

A complete revision history is at the end of this file.

Systems Affected

* Microsoft Windows NT 4.0
* Microsoft Windows 2000
* Microsoft Windows XP
* Microsoft Windows Server 2003

Overview

The CERT/CC is receiving reports of widespread activity related to a
new piece of malicious code known as W32/Blaster. This worm appears to
exploit known vulnerabilities in the Microsoft Remote Procedure Call
(RPC) Interface.

I. Description

The W32/Blaster worm exploits a vulnerability in Microsoft's DCOM RPC
interface as described in VU#568148 and CA-2003-16. Upon successful
execution, the worm attempts to retrieve a copy of the file
msblast.exe from the compromising host. Once this file is retrieved,
the compromised system then runs it and begins scanning for other
vulnerable systems to compromise in the same manner. In the course of
propagation, a TCP session to port 135 is used to execute the attack.
However, access to TCP ports 139 and 445 may also provide attack
vectors and should be considered when applying mitigation strategies.
Microsoft has published information about this vulnerability in
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-026.

Lab testing has confirmed that the worm includes the ability to launch
a TCP SYN flood denial-of-service attack against windowsupdate.com. We
are investigating the conditions under which this attack might
manifest itself. Unusual or unexpected traffic to windowsupdate.com
may indicate an infection on your network, so you may wish to monitor
network traffic.

Sites that do not use windowsupdate.com to manage patches may wish to
block outbound traffic to windowsupdate.com. In practice, this may be
difficult to achieve, since windowsupdate.com may not resolve to the
same address every time. Correctly blocking traffic to
windowsupdate.com will require detailed understanding of your network
routing architecture, system management needs, and name resolution
environment. You should not block traffic to windowsupdate.com without
a thorough understanding of your operational needs.

We have been in contact with Microsoft regarding this possibility of
this denial-of-service attack.

II. Impact

A remote attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to execute
arbitrary code with Local System privileges or to cause a
denial-of-service condition.

III. Solutions

Apply patches

All users are encouraged to apply the patches referred to in Microsoft
Security Bulletin MS03-026 as soon as possible in order to mitigate
the vulnerability described in VU#568148. These patches are also
available via Microsoft's Windows Update service.

Systems running Windows 2000 may still be vulnerable to at least a
denial-of-service attack via VU#326746 if their DCOM RPC service is
available via the network. Therefore, sites are encouraged to use the
packet filtering tips below in addition to applying the patches
supplied in MS03-026.

It has been reported that some affected machines are not able to stay
connected to the network long enough to download patches from
Microsoft. For hosts in this situation, the CERT/CC recommends the
following:
1. Physically disconnecting the system from the network
2. Check the system for signs of compromise.
+ In most cases, an infection will be indicated by the presence
of the registry key
"HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion
\Run\windows auto update" with a value of msblast.exe. If
this key is present, remove it using a registry editor.
3. If you're infected, terminate the running copy of msblast.exe
using the Task Manager.
4. Take one of the following steps to protect against the compromise
prior to installing the Microsoft patch:
+ Disable DCOM as described below
+ Enabling Microsoft's Internet Connection Filter (ICF), or
another host-level packet filtering program to block incoming
connections for 135/tcp
5. Reconnect the system to the network and apply the patches in the
recommended manner

Trend Micro, Inc. has published a set of steps to accomplish these
goals. Symantec has also published a set of steps to accomplish these
goals.

Disable DCOM

Depending on site requirements, you may wish to disable DCOM as
described in MS03-026. Disabling DCOM will help protect against this
vulnerability but may also cause undesirable side effects. Additional
details on disabling DCOM and possible side effects are available in
Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 825750.

Filter network traffic

Sites are encouraged to block network access to the following relevant
ports at network borders. This can minimize the potential of
denial-of-service attacks originating from outside the perimeter. The
specific services that should be blocked include
* 69/UDP
* 135/TCP
* 135/UDP
* 139/TCP
* 139/UDP
* 445/TCP
* 445/UDP
* 4444/TCP

Sites should consider blocking both inbound and outbound traffic to
these ports, depending on network requirements, at the host and
network level. Microsoft's Internet Connection Firewall can be used to
accomplish these goals.

If access cannot be blocked for all external hosts, the CERT/CC
recommends limiting access to only those hosts that require it for
normal operation. As a general rule, the CERT/CC recommends filtering
all types of network traffic that are not required for normal
operation.

Because current exploits for VU#568148 create a backdoor, which is in
some cases 4444/TCP, blocking inbound TCP sessions to ports on which
no legitimate services are provided may limit intruder access to
compromised hosts.

Recovering from a system compromise

If you believe a system under your administrative control has been
compromised, please follow the steps outlined in

Steps for Recovering from a UNIX or NT System Compromise

Reporting

The CERT/CC is tracking activity related to this worm as CERT#30479.
Relevant artifacts or activity can be sent to cert@cert.org with the
appropriate CERT# in the subject line.

Appendix A. Vendor Information

This appendix contains information provided by vendors. When vendors
report new information, this section is updated and the changes are
noted in the revision history. If a vendor is not listed below, we
have not received their comments.

Microsoft

Please see Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-026.

Appendix B. References

* CERT/CC Advisory CA-2003-19 -
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-19.html
* CERT/CC Vulnerability Note VU#561284 -
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/561284
* CERT/CC Vulnerability Note VU#326746 -
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/326746
* Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-026 -
http://microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-026.asp
* Microsoft Knowledge Base article 823980 -
http://support.microsoft.com?kbid=823980

Thanks

Our thanks to Microsoft Corporation for their review of and input to
this advisory.
______________________________________________________________________

Authors: Chad Dougherty, Jeffrey Havrilla, Shawn Hernan, and Marty
Lindner
______________________________________________________________________

This document is available from:
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-20.html
______________________________________________________________________

CERT/CC Contact Information

Email: cert@cert.org
Phone: +1 412-268-7090 (24-hour hotline)
Fax: +1 412-268-6989
Postal address:
CERT Coordination Center
Software Engineering Institute
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
U.S.A.

CERT/CC personnel answer the hotline 08:00-17:00 EST(GMT-5) /
EDT(GMT-4) Monday through Friday; they are on call for emergencies
during other hours, on U.S. holidays, and on weekends.

Using encryption

We strongly urge you to encrypt sensitive information sent by email.
Our public PGP key is available from
http://www.cert.org/CERT_PGP.key

If you prefer to use DES, please call the CERT hotline for more
information.

Getting security information

CERT publications and other security information are available from
our web site
http://www.cert.org/

To subscribe to the CERT mailing list for advisories and bulletins,
send email to majordomo@cert.org. Please include in the body of your
message

subscribe cert-advisory

* "CERT" and "CERT Coordination Center" are registered in the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office.
______________________________________________________________________

NO WARRANTY
Any material furnished by Carnegie Mellon University and the Software
Engineering Institute is furnished on an "as is" basis. Carnegie
Mellon University makes no warranties of any kind, either expressed or
implied as to any matter including, but not limited to, warranty of
fitness for a particular purpose or merchantability, exclusivity or
results obtained from use of the material. Carnegie Mellon University
does not make any warranty of any kind with respect to freedom from
patent, trademark, or copyright infringement.
______________________________________________________________________

Conditions for use, disclaimers, and sponsorship information

Copyright 2003 Carnegie Mellon University.

Revision History

August 11, 2003: Initial release

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8

iQCVAwUBPzhJFGjtSoHZUTs5AQEO6wP5AZuyr1OG/U9RjZDAAatFmJUuTO8SFhtd
R+nfZ54ylZPGE8ewMiS0hiuKaaXsOyk46R+zcwuPfoKffaaQX7SvwkS5uVzRBU+E
PEnECSv6O8qL0uGR6BO8zmDncOhd8YouyXWGwMCRqpvH4rMHLRB8CIgKHyEoqBpl
r69lGr8lqtE=
=3GAW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

Vive nos douaniers

Il y a eu un flash ce midi à france 3 qui parlait de ce virus, mais le journaliste a été rassurant : le virus n'a pas encore traversé nos frontières, tiens comme le nuage de Tchernobyl. :lol: :lol: :lol:

@+

 

C'est vrai Monique, et en plus je l'avais lu, mais sûrement la fatigue je n'avais pas tilté. De plus mon PC passerelle internet est sous win 98, donc pas de problème.

Merci pour tes news.

@+

 

Oui j'ai vu le journaliste aussi....... c'est lamentable.......

 

Pareil... Ils perdent en crédibilité, avec ce genre de propos

 

et attendez

ce soir ca va etre repris en national sur la 2... generalement ils procedent comme ca

 

Tiens j'ai un pote qui l'a choppé, on a été obligé d'utilisé son ghost (vive ghost) il pouvait ni installé le patch de ms, et le patch de symantec ne l'éradiquait pas :(

De plus le systeme devenait super lent, genre processus utilisé a 100%.